Tax Reforms in the Tourism Industry: How Do Things Work Today?

  • Tax Reforms in the Tourism Industry:  How Do Things Work Today?
Issue 36, June 2011.

The historic sightseeing places of Lviv attract approximately 1.5 mil¬lion tourists every year. This number is currently growing due to the European championship EURO 2012 along with the city’s approved strategy of economic development. The role of tourism is difficult to overstate. In fact, out of fifteen economic clusters operating in the city, tourism was recognized as one of the core spheres of the Lviv economy (along with business services).

More and more Lviv citizens are en¬gaged in tourism or tourism-related businesses. Interestingly, there are up to ten work places operating in order to meet the needs of one tourist (hotel industry, food, travel agencies, folk crafts, advertising and pro¬motion, media, transport and communication services, etc.). Hence, tourism is the sphere that should be most widely supported and fostered in the city. That being said, it is worth noting how the tourism industry has been impacted by the newly adopted Tax Code (TC). What has changed and how tourist business entities can operate today are the issues we will focus on in this article.

Non-deductible fees paid to ‘single taxpayers’
It is well-known that the majority of tourism businesses benefited from the simplified tax regime (single tax). That is why, the main change in the corporate profits tax (CPT) rules that affects this area is the provision of the TC under which businesses cannot deduct expenses incurred through the purchase of goods and services from entrepreneurs un¬der the ‘single tax’ regime. As such, a business cannot deduct its expenses, which leads to its corporate profits tax liability being increased. As a result of this, businesses paying CPT now intend to limit their contracts with private en¬trepreneurs.
This provision has caused inconvenience for most business entities functioning in the tourism industry. For instance, let’s take one of the most essential elements of any tourist trip — transportation. The majority of trans¬portation professionals had the single tax payer status. Today, when a travel agency or¬ders transport services for its tourist trips, it is directly forbidden by the TC to deduct the price of the services for tax purposes. In case the majority of a private entrepreneur’s coun¬terparties are CPT payers, the entrepreneur will have to change his/her tax status and become a taxpayer under the general rules if he/she wishes to preserve the existing busi¬ness relationships. In this situation a taxpayer would pay the personal income tax — 15—17% of the profit and the 34.7% single social contribution. In total, the amount of obliga¬tory payments would significantly exceed the single tax.
The second potential scenario for private entrepreneurs is to concentrate on the work with non-CPT payers. In some cases this is feasible, e.g. for the travel agencies who resell only tourist vouchers for individuals. On the other hand, this would still be narrow activity, as business will not have space to manoeuvre and develop in the future.

Tax holidays” for the tourism industry
A provision of the TC allows tourism agencies to use so-called “tax holidays”. The TC allows a 0% CPT rate until 1 January 2016 for those companies which meet the following requirements: the size of their income per each tax period (cumulative from the beginning of the year) does not exceed UAH 3 million and av¬erage employees’ salary is not less than two times the minimum wage (from 1 April 2011 the minimum wage in Ukraine is UAH 960). The majority of tourist agencies operating in Ukraine meet these requirements. However, despite such an amiable provision, business entities tend not to enter into the “tax holi¬days” as they suspect this provision may be prematurely cancelled somewhere down the road or become a reason for recurring tax audits. Furthermore, the TC includes a list of industries which are not covered by the 0% CPT rate provision. This list, in particular, includes business entities conducting cross-border transactions, which is the case for the majority of tourism agencies. These reasons together encourage businesses to shun the “tax holidays” and continue to pay taxes in the usual manner.  

Tourism in the VAT context
In contrast to CPT rules, the TC was much strict¬er for taxpayers who had paid the value added tax (VAT) along with the single tax. On 1 Janu¬ary 2011 such entrepreneurs found themselves “out of the game” since the TC does not allow for payment of both taxes. Again, businesses have to choose whether to pay VAT and its partners receive the right for input VAT credit, or to pay only the single tax without any VAT liabilities or credits in transactions.
It is worth mentioning that the TC — similar to the previously existing VAT Law — includes a separate provision on VAT for tourism services. The innovation for tourism is that the TC es¬tablishes the same regime of taxation for both residents and non-residents. The TC excluded the provision that the supply of tourism ser¬vices can only be provided by a resident. This innovation of the TC may positively influence the tourism industry throughout the country. In fact, it may attract new foreign investments which could eventually result in financial growth in the tourism industry, as well as im¬provement of provided tourism services.
The TC also adds exemptions to some transac¬tions in the tourism industry such as supply of vouchers for sanatorium and resort treatment, recreation and vacation in Ukraine (except for the treatment and recreation themselves) for chil¬dren under 18, as well as disabled adults. Hope¬fully, such exemptions will lead to a decrease in prices for the abovementioned services, making them more accessible for the population.

Tourism fees
One more innovation introduced by the TC for tourism is the implementation of a tourist fee as a local tax. This is a fee which is paid by the people who arrive at the city and receive (con¬sume) the services of temporary accommoda¬tion with the obligation to leave the location on time. The decision on the rate of the fee was adopted by the local authorities and set at 0.5- 1% of the price of the whole period of stay at local accommodations (hotel, hostel, dormi¬tory, etc.). Thus, the fee may increase the price of the accommodations without any increase in profitability of the industry. However, it is ex¬pected that the tourism fees collected will only be used by the local authorities for the poten¬tial development of the tourism industry.

Conclusion
The adoption of the TC is having a significant im¬pact on the tourism industry. Although it is dif¬ficult to give a clear evaluation of the changes at this stage, we hope that the Ukrainian tour¬ism industry and, in particular, the Lviv tourism market continue to develop with services being provided at traditional European levels.

Authors: Svitlana Nakonechna and Solomiya Borshosh are employed within the Tax & Legal Services Department of the PwC Ukraine in Lviv. They specialise in tax litigation as well as tax man¬agement and accounting.